Device Effects

Click here for Podcast Discussion Link;

Some things I do in addition to what is mentioned in the broadcast are;

I often apply Rosemary and Rose essential oil to help reduce Radiation damage and Cytokine storms, coupled with frequent Full spectrum infrared sauna time, outdoor sunlight, and periodic use of zeolites and clay to detox.

I also inject foods such as; Foods; Seeds, nuts, legumes; pistachios walnuts cashews Brazil nuts macadamia nuts sunflower seeds pumpkin seeds chai seeds - beets - cabbage - raspberry strawberries blueberries - green tea - chard - eggs - garlic - turmeric - lentils - alfalfa - peas - seaweed  - mushroom  - sweet potatoes  - hemp seeds - yogurt and Kefir, and make sure I get enough vitamin D, magnesium, and potassium.

In addition to daily doses of radiation from devices and WIFI, it would not be complete if we ignored the information regarding Wifi/Radiation induced diseases and Havana Syndrome. The following re-share article was originally published by the National Institute of Health.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/popmedicine/popmedicine/94867

'Havana Syndrome': A Real and Present Danger” by James Giordano, PhD, MPhil, a professor in the Department of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, and executive director of the Institute for Biodefense Research. Published October 5, 2021

Havana syndrome presents as a "constellation" of signs and symptoms -- a general array of features that occur to varying extents and in various combinations. The acute symptoms are relatively ambiguous, in that some individuals report sensations of pressure in the head, ringing or buzzing in the ears, and feelings of confusion and/or disorientation. Some individuals also report an acoustic component, such as a chirping, pinging, or buzzing sound. Sub-acutely, subjective symptoms include persistently decreased attentiveness, diminished executive skills, memory deficits, as well as iteratively increasing motoric and behavioral features. Clinical signs include vertigo, nausea, disruption in sleep, and problems with motor coordination.

The clinically objective signs are indicative of changes in vestibular function -- those inner ear mechanisms involved in positional orientation, balance, movement, coordination, and eye tracking. There are also objective neuropsychological deficits in learning, memory, concentration, planning, and handling psychological multitasking referred to as "cognitive load.”

The majority of the originally affected individuals, and many of those subsequently affected, have shown long-lasting, discernible neurological features that are evident upon physiologic testing and imaging, and which present difficulties in these individuals' activities of daily living.

The long-term prognosis for those affected varies. This appears related to both the type of device used to incur the effects and the duration of exposure.

There is ongoing debate as to whether these AHIs are some form of psychogenic illness. There is ample evidence to refute this possibility, at least among those individuals affected in Havana in 2016 and the hundred plus cases verified thereafter. However, the possibility of psychogenic effects within both the general public and those individuals who might be regarded as "at risk" -- ranging from those in professions that would situate them "in harm's way," to the worried well, to others with psychological overlay -- is certainly viable, and very much a reality.

What's Causing the Condition?

Because of my work studying how biotechnologies might be leveraged as weapons, I was contacted in early 2017 by colleagues from the Department of State to develop abductive forensic analysis and speculation as to what substances and/or devices could have possibly -- and most probably -- caused the signs and symptoms. Subsequently, I have maintained ongoing discussion with the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, and the U.S. Secret Service, among other agencies, relevant to Havana syndrome.

Based on the information initially provided about those affected in Havana, I posited that the effects were most likely produced by exposure to some form of directed energy. At that time, I believed some form of sonic device, either in the acoustic or ultrasonic range, was utilized. Sonic energy is capable of producing a cavitation-like effect to disrupt soft tissue and fluid compartments of the head, most notably the inner ear, and can disrupt the integrity of blood flow at the base of the skull to the brain. This cavitation would be capable of disrupting the local tissue both functionally and structurally.

There was some debate as to whether cavitation amplified within the inner ear would be capable of generating a communicating effect to the brain. My belief was that the direct arterial blood flow from the inner ear to the brain would be vulnerable to these cavitation effects. This would then create a disruption in blood flow, primarily in the small arterial branches, which would incur "downstream effects" to produce neurological features very similar to what is seen in decompression sickness.

Since 2017, iterative information reinforced my earlier speculation that another component might be involved -- namely some form of shielded, rapidly pulsed, low gigawatt microwave. It's important to note that microwave technology has progressed significantly during the past 20 years, such that the ability to rapidly pulse microwave energy, and communicate microwave effects across a relatively long distance is now both possible and feasible.

Rapidly pulsed, low-energy microwaves could disrupt the networked communicative and integrative properties of the brain, and in this way, incur both functional as well as iterative micro- to more macrostructural re-organization of neural nodes and connection pathways involved in cognition, emotion, and behavior. There is also information to suggest the possibility of a laser component, which could be used either as a targeting mechanism or as a yoking vehicle to enable greater accuracy in delivery of other forms of directed energy.

Who Is Responsible?

As to the intent of using such devices, it's certainly possible that the effects were artifacts (or side-effects) of sophisticated surveillance technology from another country. This still remains a possibility. However, it is more likely that this was either a surveillance and disruption engagement, or an intentionally disruptive engagement alone utilizing one or more forms of directed energy.

The U.S., Russia, and China all have programs dedicated to the development and use of various forms of directed energy. These technologies are industrially utilized to assess the integrity and vulnerability of both inorganic and organic matter. Many of these research and development programs are occurring within the commercial space, and therefore are somewhat shielded by intellectual property laws that constrain the extent of disclosure required and/or open-source surveillance allowable.

It is not unfeasible that existing devices, currently used for other purposes, could be modified by proxies or rogue actors, particularly if cryptically provided by some national source with specific instructions – if not additional materials -- toward disruptive intent.

A Threat to Public Health and National Security

The use of emerging biotechnology in this type of non-kinetic engagement -- non-traditional approaches that don't rely on physical force -- is becoming a clear and present danger. The initial engagements were against "high-value" targets, in other words, individuals whose professional qualifications and roles were important enough that disrupting their capabilities would most certainly incur a disruptive effect.

The message is clear that political targets are viable, and may be vulnerable. But it's also important to consider the value of "low-value" targets, such as the average person on the street. Certainly, more diverse and diffused engagements of this sort against the general population, with some randomness, is capable of inducing a mass reactive public effect. An opponent could manifest concerns among the "worried well." Additionally, continued uncertainties about the nature of the device and its uses can contribute to the "fog of engagement," or "fog of war." Although one must be cautious about equating such AHIs with "acts of war," at least as based on current definitions under international law.

A Line of Defense

As more cases emerge, there is renewed dedication toward further understanding and developing preparation, readiness, and response to these types of engagements. The current administration's reinvestment of funding towards these ends is encouraging, but it must be augmented to meet the actual level of threat.

While I'm encouraged by recent governmental activity, I remain concerned in light of the effort and economics needed to achieve and sustain preparedness against these increasing threats.